data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f790/7f7903d92c679c9597de6da8bf9f649e5a8fdc65" alt="Fluid mask vs topaz remask"
I've also found that a number of the Topaz Labs plug-ins have been of benefit and I use several of them in my normal PP workflow so I opted to get the Topaz Labs suite of plug-ins.
#Fluid mask vs topaz remask software
However I have found a way around this and have now integrated iSGM with the creation of masks with Topaz software into my workflow. What makes it unique is the fact that unlike. However, since these methods only create masks and not a selection that can be saved it seems that this method is not usable for the iSGM method. As far as background removal is concerned, this plug-in works more or less than the others on this list by eliminating unwanted features and details and highlighting the main image. Obviously, you can create selections from the masks so if you can get one, by default you have the other. Finally, Topaz Remask winds up the list of the top 6 photo editing plug-ins for background removal. Whether you need a simple hard line mask or you are dealing with masking hair, tree branches, or need to change the background behind a bride's veil, ReMask is the best tool I've found. Topaz Remask Finally, Topaz Remask winds up the list of the top 6 photo editing plug-ins for background removal. Instead I use a Photoshop Plug-in called Topaz Labs ReMask. These include but not limited to Adobe Photoshop, Corel Paint Shop Pro, Macromedia Fireworks and Windows. If I have a complex element, I don't bother with doing selections at all as I find them to be too time consuming to get accurate. Trials are available so OP can see if it's any better. More settings, more powerfull then photoshop's own selection tool. Personally I would give the notch to Fluid mask 3 and Topaz labs remask 5. I'd appreciate your comments/advice.I use CS5 as I do a lot of work with individual elements of an image and that requires extensive use of selections to create the layer masks. And Topaz is almost identical to Photoshop's own tools and not one bit easier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f47a5/f47a5ea3eff63c31524589b857879e8cb08dded5" alt="fluid mask vs topaz remask fluid mask vs topaz remask"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48f3a/48f3acef1093a83be1fdb15ae67b111b4cc00059" alt="fluid mask vs topaz remask fluid mask vs topaz remask"
So, my question is, are the tools in CS more refined, or is there simply more options? I find that using selections in PSE a rather clumsy process and needs some work to get a more refined/accurate result. Topaz ReMask will make its calculations and will give you a final cutout and a mask for it, depending on how you set your preferences.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f790/7f7903d92c679c9597de6da8bf9f649e5a8fdc65" alt="Fluid mask vs topaz remask"